The relationship between materiality/form and book content is crucial to book production and reception. The form of a book – its physical attributes, such as the paper, typography, layout, and binding – can influence how the reader perceives and interprets the content. In turn, the content can also influence the form, as it can dictate the design choices made by the bookmaker.
From the blog Books On Books Collection the book that caught my eye is Andrew White Tuer “The Horn Book” an excellent example of how content can influence form. The book’s subject matter, the history of book production, necessitates a detailed examination of various printing techniques, papers, bindings, and other aspects of bookmaking. As a result, the book’s materiality is carefully chosen to reflect its content, with detailed illustrations and descriptions of historical printing practices, binding techniques, and other elements of book production. the relationship between materiality/form and book content is complex and dynamic. Both aspects influence each other, with the form of a book informing the content and the content influencing the form. It is essential to study these book features separately and concerning one another, as they are both critical components of the bookmaking process and the reader’s interpretation of the book.
This entry is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license.
Hey Lisbel
I like that you used the word relationship between form, material, and content of a book. Because without those three working together, what can we classify that as? There needs to be an understanding and relationship among the three, and we as readers must forge almost an agreement and bond to understand honestly what can be called a book. I always tell my students there is no harm in understanding what we don’t know until we sit down and truly study what the unknown is.